Houston Rockets Stats

Player	G	PTS	FG	FG%	3P%	FT%	OREB	DREB	REB	AST	STL	TO	PF
Steve Francis3•G	79	1310	450	40.3%	29.2%	77.5%	116	317	433	493	139	294	257
Cuttino Mobley5•G	80	1260	460	42.6%	39%	81.1%	40	322	362	258	107	180	179
Mark Jackson31•G	42	103	34	34%	17.1%	71.8%	10	60	70	119	17	53	41
Mike Wilks29•G	26	50	17	47.2%	60%	83.3%	3	13	16	17	3	7	15
Charles Oakley33•F	7	9	2	33.3%	—	83.3%	—	5	5	2	—	1	8
Jim Jackson21•F-G	80	1033	382	42.4%	40%	84.3%	52	435	487	226	86	175	227
Adrian Griffin7•G-F	19	11	5	27.8%	50%	—	1	18	19	10	7	3	17
Scott Padgett35•F	58	200	74	44.3%	43.1%	75%	46	93	139	23	12	22	73
Yao Ming11•C	82	1431	535	52.2%	—	80.9%	197	538	735	122	22	204	273
Bostjan Nachbar9•F	45	138	47	35.6%	36.5%	72.4%	8	62	70	30	14	23	72
Clar. Weatherspoon30•F	52	261	104	49.3%	—	73.6%	74	130	204	30	30	35	75
Kelvin Cato13•F	69	418	161	44.7%	—	67.6%	153	319	472	72	52	84	203
Maurice Taylor2•F	75	862	367	48%	—	73.6%	131	253	384	107	43	149	253
Eric Piatkowski52•G-F	49	201	72	37.7%	35.2%	87.5%	10	63	73	26	16	29	42

Player	G	PTS	FG	FG%	3P%	FT%	OREB	DREB	REB	AST	STL	TO	PF
Steve Francis3•G	79	16.6	5.7	40.3%	29.2%	77.5%	1.5	4	5.5	6.2	1.8	3.7	3.3
Cuttino Mobley5•G	80	15.8	5.8	42.6%	39%	81.1%	0.5	4	4.5	3.2	1.3	2.3	2.2
Mark Jackson31•G	42	2.5	0.8	34%	17.1%	71.8%	0.2	1.4	1.7	2.8	0.4	1.3	1
Mike Wilks29•G	26	1.9	0.7	47.2%	60%	83.3%	0.1	0.5	0.6	0.7	0.1	0.3	0.6
Charles Oakley33•F	7	1.3	0.3	33.3%	—	83.3%	—	0.7	0.7	0.3	—	0.1	1.1
Jim Jackson21•F-G	80	12.9	4.8	42.4%	40%	84.3%	0.7	5.4	6.1	2.8	1.1	2.2	2.8
Adrian Griffin7•G-F	19	0.6	0.3	27.8%	50%	—	0.1	0.9	1	0.5	0.4	0.2	0.9
Scott Padgett35•F	58	3.4	1.3	44.3%	43.1%	75%	0.8	1.6	2.4	0.4	0.2	0.4	1.3
Yao Ming11•C	82	17.5	6.5	52.2%	—	80.9%	2.4	6.6	9	1.5	0.3	2.5	3.3
Bostjan Nachbar9•F	45	3.1	1	35.6%	36.5%	72.4%	0.2	1.4	1.6	0.7	0.3	0.5	1.6
Clar. Weatherspoon30•F	52	5	2	49.3%	—	73.6%	1.4	2.5	3.9	0.6	0.6	0.7	1.4
Kelvin Cato13•F	69	6.1	2.3	44.7%	—	67.6%	2.2	4.6	6.8	1	0.8	1.2	2.9
Maurice Taylor2•F	75	11.5	4.9	48%	—	73.6%	1.7	3.4	5.1	1.4	0.6	2	3.4
Eric Piatkowski52•G-F	49	4.1	1.5	37.7%	35.2%	87.5%	0.2	1.3	1.5	0.5	0.3	0.6	0.9

NEXT UP: