If you'd like to ask a question of Pacers.com analyst Conrad Brunner, submit it along with your full name and hometown to
|
INDIANAPOLIS, Dec. 19 - What's the deal with Jalen?
That is by far the most prevalent question stuffing the mailbox these days, as the relationship between head coach Isiah Thomas and star player Jalen Rose becomes source of public debate. Because so many readers have submitted questions about Rose, no single Inquisitor of the Week was chosen. Instead, I will endeavor to address this issue with a few hot buttons.
![]() Jalen Rose |
![]() Isiah Thomas |
![]() Marc Jackson |
Q. I read that Marc Jackson of Golden State is unhappy with the minutes he is receiving and is hoping to be traded soon. I know that the Pacers showed interest in him over the summer. Do you think that the Pacers might try to work out a trade, and who do you think they would give up for him if they did? (From Walter in Chicago)
A. With the change in coaching from Dave Cowens to Brian Winters, it's unclear how Jackson's role might change with the Warriors, so it's possible they may be more reluctant to make a trade. Even so, there are a couple of points to consider. At 6-8, Jackson is really an undersized power forward, and not a true center. He is primarily a face-up scorer and doesn't have a reputation for strong defense or rebounding. What the Pacers are trying to find is a player big enough to defend centers whose primary talents are defense and rebounding.
![]() Reggie Miller |
Q. I don't want anyone to force shots. Jalen, Jermaine, Al and others are taking good shots, so I wouldn't want to tell any of them to shoot less - just so a more famous player could shoot more. I think a decrease of two attempts per game seems reasonable for a 36-year-old guard on a very young team. I think it is more important that we continue to develop our younger players. In my tenure as a season-ticket holder, I've only seen three or four guys in a decade comfortable taking shots with the game on the line - Chuck (Person), Reggie, and Byron (Scott). I liked the shots that Al and Jermaine took at the end of the Knicks game, I just wish they didn't rush the shots - they had plenty of time. But that is something only learned by experience (and by experience, I mean trying, failing, then correcting.) Isiah played on teams with three or four threats (himself, Joe Dumars, Mark Aguirre, Vinnie Johnson) to score a game-winning shot; clearly, he's trying to develop the same versatility here. Your thoughts? (From Jay in Elmhurst, IL)
A. It's a necessity for Thomas to develop at least one, and preferably two or three, go-to options for end-game situations - for the future. Of course, Miller is still getting the job done but that can't last forever. The younger players should really study Miller; if they did, your point would be validated. Miller always has been at his best when he slows his game down a notch to gain full control in the final minutes, a lesson it took him a few years to learn.
Q. With the new year coming I've been thinking about years (and Pacers) past. Will we ever get to see "Slick" (Leonard) coach another Pacer game, even if just one? What a treat it would be to see a nationally televised game and instead of throwback jerseys, have throwback coaches! (From Ryan in Indianapolis)
A. If you listen to Slick as the radio analyst with regularity, you know he still coaches every game.
![]() Charles Oakley |
Q. I heard a rumor that Charles Oakley wants to be traded to the Pacers. Have you heard of any talks with the Bulls? Although he definitely does not fit into the youth movement, he may be able to assist some of our younger guys. (From Ryan in Nashville, TN)
A. It's hard to figure out what kind of movement Oakley would fit in. He grumped his way out of Toronto and is in the process of doing so with the Bulls. While the Oakley of five years ago would be exactly what the Pacers are looking for, the Oakley of today is far less attractive. Veterans can only lead effectively when they can still produce on the court, otherwise their voices go unheard. In that regard, Oakley's time appears to have passed.
![]() Al Harrington |
Q. Why isn't Al Harrington getting the opportunity to start any games this season? I haven't seen the plus-minus chart lately, but it seems like he provides much needed energy for the team. I think Isiah Thomas should let him start just one game and see how it works out. (From Sam in Columbus, IN)
A. While I certainly understand your desire to see more of Harrington - and an argument can be made that the first unit could certainly benefit from his energy and intensity - this would fall into the category of fixing what isn't broken. As it is, he's playing full-time minutes. Coming off the bench, he is able to match up either at small forward or power forward. That couldn't happen with the first unit. Coming off the bench, he fills the role of primary scorer. With the first unit, there are other mouths to feed. At the moment, Thomas' use of Harrington is working well for both the player and the team.





















