
Posted Jun 2 2012 1:06PM
BOSTON -- We have a clear statistical theme for these Eastern Conference finals.
No, it's not fouls or free throws. It's points in the paint. The Boston Celtics had a season-high 58 of them in Game 3 on Friday, a 101-91 victory over the Miami Heat that sets up a critical Game 4 on Sunday (8:30 p.m. ET, ESPN).
In the first two games of the series, 68 of the Celtics' 162 shots (42 percent) came from the paint. In Game 3, it was 44 of 76 (58 percent). And they almost eliminated the inefficient mid-range shot from their arsenal.
Only one team in the league -- the historically bad Charlotte Bobcats -- took a greater percentage of their shots from mid-range than the Celtics (38.0 percent) did in the regular season. And through Game 2 of the conference finals, Boston was attempting an even higher percentage of their shots from mid-range (38.4) in the playoffs.
But on Friday, Boston only took four mid-range shots in the first half and just 15 total. That's the fewest mid-range shots they've taken all season, with the previous low being 18.
Kevin Garnett was the key. Instead of playing pick-and-pop all night, he rolled to the basket or posted up, finally playing like the biggest guy on the floor. And with the Heat often fronting the post, the Celtics were able to get the ball to Garnett under the basket, where he took 11 of his 16 shots.
| Kevin Garnett's shooting | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| P = From the paint O = From outside the paint |
In the Celtics' nine postseason wins, Garnett has averaged 6.8 shots from the paint. In their seven losses, he's averaged 4.4 shots in the paint.
Garnett wasn't the only one getting in the paint in Game 3. Seven different Celtics scored in the paint, including Rajon Rondo, who finished better at the rim (6-for-9 in the restricted area) than he did in the first two games (10-for-22).
The Celtics are 14-0 over the last two seasons when they score more than 50 points in the paint. It's such a simple formula for success, but much easier said than done, especially against this opponent. Typically, Miami both prevents shots in the paint and defends them well. Just not on Friday.
Of course, the biggest difference between Game 2 and Game 3 wasn't the Boston offense, which was potent both nights, whether it was scoring in the paint or not. Friday was the first time in the series when the Celtics actually slowed down the Miami attack.
The Heat actually shot well from the field (49.4 percent). But they didn't get to the line as much as they did in the first two games. And when they did, they couldn't make their free throws, shooting just 10-for-20 from the stripe.
Most important, the Celtics rebounded better than they did in Games 1 and 2. After totaling 26 offensive rebounds and 35 second chance points in the first two games, the Heat had just six offensive boards and seven second chance points on Friday.
Miami also shot poorly from the corners for the second time in the series. In Games 1 and 3, they shot 1-for-17 on corner 3-pointers. In Game 2, they were 7-for-14.
Also key to the Boston defense was Brandon Bass' foul trouble. The Celtics went small for about 36 minutes in Game 3 and outscored the Heat 69-51 in the 31 minutes when Bass was on the bench.
Small lineups have proven to be more effective for the Celtics in this series, at least when Kevin Garnett is the one big man on the floor. Boston has outscored Miami 115-87 in 55 minutes when Garnett has been on the floor with four guards or wings (nine different combinations).
| Celtics efficiency, big vs. small | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *Does not include garbage time OffRtg = Points scored per 100 possessions DefRtg = Points allowed per 100 possessions NetRtg = Point differential per 100 possessions |
That's some pretty efficient offense, but the bigger difference between the small lineups and the big lineups is the defense. The Heat have gone to the line more often against the Celtics' small lineups, but have shot just 30-for-85 (35 percent) against Garnett and four smalls. When Bass and Garnett have been on the floor together, Miami has shot 43-for-86 (50 percent).
Without Chris Bosh, the Heat are basically playing small all the time. So it may be that Bass just doesn't have anyone to guard. As evidence, all you have to do is compare the Celtics' defensive numbers with Bass on or off the floor.
| Celtics efficiency with Bass on and off the floor | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Whether Bass is in foul trouble or not, expect to see a lot more of the Celtics' small lineups in Game 4.
All numbers courtesy of NBA.com/stats.
John Schuhmann is a staff writer for NBA.com. You can e-mail him here and follow him on twitter.
The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA, its clubs or Turner Broadcasting.

![]() | Press Pass: Gasol and Pondexter Marc Gasol and Quincy Pondexter talk with the media after the Grizzlies lose Game 1 to the Spurs. |
![]() | The Daily Zap Another look at the Spurs 22-point rout of the Grizzlies in Game 1. |
![]() | Sunday's Top 5 Plays Tony Parker's laser dime lands at the number one spot on Sunday's Top 5. |
![]() | Steal of the Night Mike Conley comes up with the steal and takes it all the way to the other end for the layup in traffic. |
![]() | Nightly Notable Tony Parker records 20 points and nine assists to lead the Spurs in Game 1 over the Grizzlies. |